Comparative Analysis of Biosecurity
Practices,
Antimicrobial Usage, and Antimicrobial Resistance
in Korean
Pig Farms
by Farm Type
Kyung-Hyo Do1, Su-Jin Choe1, Chang Min Jung2,
Seong-Won Lee3, Suk-Kyung Lim4,
Hyun-Mi Kang4,
Kwang-Won Seo1*, and Wan-Kyu Lee1*
1College
of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University,
Cheongju, Korea;
2Onnuri
Animal Hospital, Cheonan, Korea;
3Boehringer
Ingelheim Animal Health Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea;
4Animal
and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural
Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea
Pig farming is a major sector of animal agriculture in Korea. Biosecurity
practices and responsible antimicrobial use are key components in reducing
disease incidence and mitigating antimicrobial resistance in swine production.
This study aimed to compare biosecurity practices, antimicrobial usage, and
antimicrobial resistance profiles
across conventional, integrated, and grandparent (GP) pig farms in Korea.
Data were collected from 69 pig farms (30 conventional, 30 integrated, and 9 GP)
using detailed questionnaires and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of
Escherichia coli.
GP farms exhibited significantly higher productivity, with 77.8% achieving more
than 23 marketed-pigs-per-sow-per-year and 44.4% having livability rates over
96%, outperforming conventional (20.0, 20.0%) and integrated farms (36.7,
26.7%). GP farms also demonstrated stricter biosecurity, including 100%
adherence to farm-only vehicle use, regular veterinarian evaluation, and
stringent access controls. Antimicrobial usage was lowest on GP farms (7.3±4.3
prescriptions) compared to conventional farms (9.7±7.4). Conventional farms
exhibited the highest resistance to critical antimicrobials
such as ceftiofur (conventional: 41.5; integrated: 23.9; GP: 21.8%) and
ciprofloxacin (conventional: 51.0; integrated: 45.4; GP: 33.9%).
The 14.4% of conventional isolates were resistant to 10 antimicrobial
subclasses, compared to just 1.7 and 1.6% in integrated and GP farms,
respectively.
Stricter biosecurity and more prudent antimicrobial use in GP and integrated
farms were associated with lower resistance rates, highlighting the importance
of enhanced stewardship and management practices in conventional farms.
These findings can also inform the
development of policies and guidelines for sustainable and responsible pig
production, aiming to reduce antimicrobial usage in Korea.
To Cite This Article:
Do KH, Choe SJ, Jung CM, Lee SW, Lim SK, Kang HM, Seo KW and Lee WK
2025. Comparative analysis of
biosecurity
practices,
antimicrobial usage, and antimicrobial resistance
in Korean
pig farms
by farm type.
Pak Vet J. http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2025.199