Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Effects in Young and Adult Dogs Under
Anesthesia
Induced
by Butorphanol-Midazolam-Propofol Versus
Dexmedetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam
Since distinct physiological characteristics are exhibited by dogs of various
ages, the effects on cardiopulmonary function, hepatic and renal metabolism,
vary depending on the induction anesthesia protocol employed.
Butorphanol-midazolam-propofol (BMP) and dexmedetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam
(DZ) are the most commonly adopted induction anesthesia protocols for canines.
In this study, induction effects and cardiopulmonary impacts of BMP and DZ
anesthesia protocols in young (Y) and adult (A) dogs were investigated. Twelve
adult and twelve young dogs were allocated into four groups: DZ-A, BMP-A, DZ-Y,
and BMP-Y. In DZ protocol, tiletamine-zolazepam and dexmedetomidine were
injected intravenously. In BMP protocol, butorphanol, midazolam and propofol
were used for anesthesia induction. Following tracheal intubation, the
anesthesia was sustained using isoflurane. Post-intubation, non-invasive blood
pressure (NIBP), heart rate (HR), peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2),
respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and body
temperature (BT) were monitored at 0 - 60 minutes. Time from induction to
intubation, duration of anesthesia, time from sternal recumbency to standing,
and induction, intubation, and recovery scores were also recorded. Results
demonstrated that the DZ-A and DZ-Y groups exhibited significantly better
induction, recovery, and intubation success rates compared to the BMP-A and
BMP-Y groups, respectively. Additionally, NIBP and HR of the DZ-Y group were
lower than those of the BMP-Y group. Other physiological parameters and
indicators of liver and kidney function for the four treatment groups remained
unaffected, with values were within normal ranges. In conclusion, both the BMP
and DZ protocols are viable options for young dogs; however, the DZ protocol has
a lesser impact on HR and NIBP. In adult dogs, the DZ protocols demonstrates
superior efficacy for induction than BMP protocol.
To Cite This Article:
Bai1 H, Gao R, Li R, Ma T, Du S and Zhang Z,
2025.
Evaluation of cardiopulmonary effects in young and adult dogs under anesthesia
induced
by butorphanol-midazolam-propofol versus dexmedetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam.
Pak Vet J. http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2025.236